A buyer sends a screenshot of an inspection report and asks whether it proves the car is fine. The report is genuine, but three things need checking first: who issued it, what was tested, and whether the destination country accepts it.
A third-party report proves the condition of the car at the moment of inspection. It does not replace the destination country's admission documents. The China side settles whether the car may be exported, the destination's conformity assessment settles whether it may enter. Neither substitutes for the other.
✓Export inspection report plus the destination's required conformity documents
Condition and admission each have evidence, missing either one stops the deal
!A domestic third-party report only
It describes condition, it does not prove the destination will release the car
!A report that does not state its inspection scope
Items beyond the body and shell may not have been tested at all, high-voltage systems and underbody are often blank
×Using a domestic report as an admission certificate
Most destinations accept only certificates from their own designated bodies, not general third-party reports
Five things to read in the report
| Element | What to look at | Usual gap | What the gap costs |
|---|
| VIN and plate consistency | VIN on the cover, photo of the plate, registration document, all three aligned | VIN copied by hand, no photo comparison | Cloned or re-shelled cars pass unnoticed |
| Structural parts | Longitudinal members, shock absorber mounts, A/B/C pillars, rear panel: any welding, cutting or reshaping | "Structure normal" with no basis stated | A major accident car is sold as clean |
| Odometer source | Whether the figure came from the cluster, the module or service records | A number with no stated source | Clocked cars cannot be identified |
| Accident and flood findings | Impact extent, water line, area of fire damage | Conclusions without supporting photos | Nothing left to re-examine in a dispute |
| Inspection scope | Which systems the scope section lists | Covers body and shell only | You think it was fully checked, most of it was not |
The nine major-accident situations in GB/T 30323-2013, including welding, cutting or reshaping of longitudinal members, shock absorber mounts and A/B/C pillars, airbag deployment, water above half the body or water entering the cabin, and fire damage over 0.5 square metres, are a useful reference for judging a car. But that standard is a recommended national standard for appraisal, not an export inspection standard. The export inspection rules are WM/T 8-2022 and WM/T 9-2022. Do not mix the two.
What the export inspection rests on
MOFCOM Announcement No.6 of 2024 requires export vehicles to meet WM/T 8-2022 (used passenger cars) or WM/T 9-2022 (used commercial vehicles and trailers), with a product test report issued by a third-party testing body. Where the destination country has admission standards, the exporter must also declare conformity with those standards.
Note the word declare. The announcement makes conformity with the destination standard a declaration duty of the company, not a licensing act. Declaring conformity does not mean the other side has accepted it.
Whether the destination accepts it, country by country
Kenya accepts only a CoR issued by a KEBS-designated body, QISJ. Its agency network covers Japan, the UK, the UAE, Singapore, Thailand and South Africa, and China is not on that list. Cars shipped from China can only go to destination inspection, with an Interpol clearance certificate, proof of deregistration in the country of previous registration and the export documents.
Tanzania runs the TBS PVoC system, and shipments from China are inspected before shipment by CCIC, which issues the CoC or CoR.
Ghana requires in principle inspection in the exporting country by a GSA-recognised body, but the mandatory programme has been suspended since 5 October 2026 and no new date is set. Saudi Arabia runs SABER: a PCoC per model and an SCoC per shipment, issued by a SASO-recognised body, and Chinese test reports are not within its accepted scope. For Jordan no official rule was found in this round, so no conclusion is drawn.
For the CoR problem in East Africa see "Kenya and Tanzania used-car PVoC: why no CoR from China?", for Saudi Arabia see "Saudi SABER: two certificates, a 5-year cap and left-hand drive", for Ghana see "From October 2026, these used cars cannot enter Ghana".
Four steps
1Pick the body by destination
Decide which certificate the destination wants, then work back to the institution, do not test first and look for a buyer later
2Set the test items
Put structural parts, accident and flood, odometer source, high-voltage systems and underbody into the instruction
3Read the scope first
Turn to the inspection scope section and confirm what was and was not tested
4Align with the destination file
CoR, CoC, PCoC or SCoC, destination inspection, complete them per the rules in force
Five traps
- ✓Promising clearance at destination on the strength of a domestic report
- ✓A report with conclusions but no basis, impossible to re-examine in a dispute
- ✓No odometer source, so a clocked car looks clean
- ✓Scope covering only body and shell, high-voltage systems and underbody untested
- ✓Age or accident history already outside the destination rules, and no report can fix it
Closing
Inspection answers whether the car is worth the price, admission answers whether the car may enter the country. Prepare the two files separately, and attach the destination's document to the contract before signing. To size the landed cost, run the CIF figure through the site's import duty calculator (/en/duty-calculator).
This reflects the position verified on 5 November 2026. Test items follow the inspection body's report template; acceptance rules follow the destination standards body's rules in force and the agent's written confirmation.